We can (can) make to you, but the Civil War was won some and lost others. That's right.
There was never a message sent to the media since the Negrin government in Valencia (on the other hand, fled to France weeks before the war ended) announcing the triumph of those loyal to the Republic. The historical truth is that the message came from Burgos and triumphantly proclaimed the triumph of the national troops.
now left Gramscian ZETAPAD and revisionist attempts to change history with the complicity of a court star (if we're lucky to become stars, like anise) unaware of the amnesty laws of 1977, the Constitution and the most elementary principles of criminal prosecution. Fortunately, the end is inhibited in the case, probably because President George W. Bush comes to an end and decided to prosecute the war in Iraq, which have more importance the media. Or maybe you're thinking about the process to JFK Bay of Pigs invasion, Nixon and the Vietnam War or the invasion Hiroito Japanese in China. Or all at once, in a bold legal-historical mishmash fool. We will see in the coming weeks.
I'll say it clear enough so that everyone understands: We won the war. Yes, us. Obviously I was not there, but I won as the won my grandfather, an officer of the army. Whenever I go to my brother in northern Spain, I keep seeing the portrait of my grandfather R. with uniform (I think) commander. It is a picture well after the war, I think of the time when he was professor of the Military Academy in the early 50's. This portrait I've seen all my life, since before I was in Zaragoza at my grandparents. If he enlisted in 1936 was because he believed in something. My grandfather was anything but a coup.
was a cruel war in which more than one million English were killed and more still had to go. Was it a mistake? The error was the perpetuation of Franco in power, not the seizure of power in itself. The way to reach that power is not the least of it, but some dictators of the time they reached the government through elections, and were far worse (and for that very much shorter) than Franco. Theoretically (only theoretically) the government of Hitler would be legitimized by elections, while the Franco, for having taken up arms against the Republic. And I think there is little doubt what was the most brutal regime in the history of mankind.
The big mistake was staying after Franco won the war. Instead of leaving the country in civilian hands that led Spain to a democracy that engages all after finishing with the historical mistake of the Second Republic (a good idea in a country not ready for that), decided it was there why I will go now that I'm the fucking love? Almost 40 years lost and isolated from the world in the midst of priests, soldiers and phalanges (although these did not last long).
For those who think that saying "mine won the war "And the latter think about Franco's dictatorship is a contradiction, which read a bit about unfortunate history of the Second English Republic , especially the parts where the PSOE a coup d'etat on October 7, 1934 or supported the October Revolution of 34 also (or Indalecio Prieto Caballero and others), or the proclamation of "estat catalá " also in this beautiful month of October 34. The two years of the CEDA and the Radical Party was a hell just for the action of the PSOE, always so respectful of the opinions of others. By the way, do not remember this when the hysterical memory.
However, since we will review the history, this year 2008 has been prolific in anniversaries: On a completely sterile and dispassionate view, we can conclude that the War of Independence was as illegal as it may have been the Civil War, since we can not ignore the legitimate king of Spain was José I Bonaparte from the June 6, 1808.
Or was legitimate thanks (or blame) for events Bayonne? Was not there a series of resignations that led to the result that José I'd just as the legitimate king of Spain? As Judge yourself by rising up against the legally constituted power The Stubborn , generals and Brown Palafox, Agustina de Aragón, masters Daoiz and Velarde, Lt. Ruiz ... even the Duke of Wellington. Warrants Cúrsense parishes, civil registries and other agencies to certify whether Palafox is dead (just in case) as a step prior to processing by coup. And desentierrese poor French soldiers executed in any road, ditch or wall of the cemetery that a blunderbuss and slashes fell victims of cruel English repression. What is that to dedicate streets and squares in Spain May 2, Independence, dancing or Sites of Zaragoza? Are Napoleon, Murat or fallen soldier gabacho anonymous law enforcement matters which they should have names plates that give name to the ways of our cities.
Obviously, all this would be a total nonsense. But it would be an exercise in pure historical consistency: Pepe Botella (who was a teetotaler, by the way) was as legitimate as could be ana. What was the one, it was the other.
you know? To my knowledge no member of my family in the gutters. There is a brother of my grandfather who died in the war whose body was never found, though. About whether I would like to have her tested for DNA to each skull or each phalanx (not second) of the toe that is out there to see if it is him, because I would peel it a lot, obviously. While I can understand those who want to take the bones of their relatives under the earth. I can applaud you do, even with government assistance. Now, we get some and took others. Nationalist Spain committed excesses and atrocities committed as Republican Spain. Although the truth is not going to find many traces of the 30 people were thrown alive and kicking at the lions and tigers Wild Animal House Retreat in 1936, recreating the Roman Colosseum in the Czech revolutionary Madrid. This is not spoken, and not talking about the shot in Paracuellos del Jarama, breaking out in Barbastro in ... throughout Republican Spain, and rushed.
History is written by the victors. Clear as Franco's regime manipulated the war in their interests, is now allegedly "remanipularla" again to pass off as "good " Republicans. And the truth is that talking about good and bad in a civil war is like talking about if you want more Dad or Mom: They were all English and all fighting for Spain, each in its concept and idea of \u200b\u200bit. And so therefore it was error for 40 years considered as good to those of Franco and as bad for the Republicans, like trying to do now to reverse.
One thing is certain, clear, clear, incontrovertible: Some won and others lost. And that, although not like many, is what happened. Claim now made up the story again to make to win the losers (although all lost) is a folly that can only be in a documentary so stupid and implausible as the one who made those The Sixth ("Hitler walking Cibeles? The Real Madrid CF is called only?) as a consequence of the militancy that make Mediapro chain and in his pamphlet "Pubic " of republicanism and anti-Catholicism papanatoide outdated. I myself am a Republican and I'm not Catholic, but I'm not an asshole, and the Republic I do not look anything like they want them. And of course, let alone the Republic 1931.
But of course: How could I forget and not mention until now that ZETAPAD has a grandfather shot by the fascist hordes ? That's the key: The leader of the "Alliance of Civilizations " is not capable of marrying views civilized in their own country, the leader cosmic dialogue between East and West do not know with whom they talk so in Spain since November 1975. With who in 1977 decided to close the wounds almost 40 years earlier. Prefer to reopen the scars (which otherwise could not care piquillo peppers almost everyone) to stop dedicating a street in León to his grandfather.
0 comments:
Post a Comment